<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Relocation Archives - Contested Histories</title>
	<atom:link href="https://contestedhistories.org/tag/relocation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://contestedhistories.org/tag/relocation/</link>
	<description>Practical remedies to disputes over historical markers in public spaces</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2025 22:15:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>National Holocaust Names Memorial in Amsterdam</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/national-holocaust-names-memorial-in-amsterdam?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=national-holocaust-names-memorial-in-amsterdam</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Memorial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resolved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[113]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2013, the City of Amsterdam decided to build a memorial to the Dutch Jews, Sinti and Roma, who were murdered during the Holocaust. Circa 102,000 — between 75 and 80 percent of the Netherlands’ Jewish population — were killed during World War II, the highest rate in Western Europe. The design by the renowned [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/national-holocaust-names-memorial-in-amsterdam">National Holocaust Names Memorial in Amsterdam</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In 2013, the City of Amsterdam decided to build a memorial to the Dutch Jews, Sinti and Roma, who were murdered during the Holocaust. Circa 102,000 — between 75 and 80 percent of the Netherlands’ Jewish population — were killed during World War II, the highest rate in Western Europe. The design by the renowned architect Daniel Libeskind invoked substantial controversy among the city&#8217;s residents, mainly due to concerns about foot traffic, public safety, and the reduction of green spaces in urban areas. Although the dispute hindered construction for years, the memorial was completed and opened in 2021.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/national-holocaust-names-memorial-in-amsterdam">National Holocaust Names Memorial in Amsterdam</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edward Colston Statue in Bristol</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/edward-colston-statue-in-bristol?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=edward-colston-statue-in-bristol</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Resolved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Removed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contextualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[173]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The legacy of Edward Colston, a Bristol-born merchant and Royal African Company executive, involves a complex history relating to local politics, educational institutions, and organisations in Bristol. For many years, the Society of Merchant Venturers, which held significant influence over local heritage policy-making, curated and protected the Colston legacy. At the same time, several groups [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/edward-colston-statue-in-bristol">Edward Colston Statue in Bristol</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The legacy of Edward Colston, a Bristol-born merchant and Royal African Company executive, involves a complex history relating to local politics, educational institutions, and organisations in Bristol. For many years, the Society of Merchant Venturers, which held significant influence over local heritage policy-making, curated and protected the Colston legacy. At the same time, several groups and individuals attempted to remove Colston’s presence from Bristol’s public spaces due to his involvement in the Transatlantic slave trade. The debate surrounding Colston’s legacy spread outside of Bristol after Black Lives Matter protesters toppled Colston’s statue into the Bristol Harbour in June 2020. The city is still dealing with the effects of these events and looking for solutions regarding contested narratives about imperialism and slavery in the city’s public spaces. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/edward-colston-statue-in-bristol">Edward Colston Statue in Bristol</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wartime Labourer Statue in Busan</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/wartime-labourer-statue-in-busan?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wartime-labourer-statue-in-busan</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2023 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[409]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>First installed amidst clashes with local authorities on May 1, 2018, the Wartime Labourer Statue in Busan, Republic of Korea (South Korea), symbolises one aspect of the trauma left by Japanese colonialism. Initially planned to be erected in front of the Japanese Consulate General in the city, activists ignored the authorities’ order to stay away [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/wartime-labourer-statue-in-busan">Wartime Labourer Statue in Busan</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">First installed amidst clashes with local authorities on May 1, 2018, the Wartime Labourer Statue in Busan, Republic of Korea (South Korea), symbolises one aspect of the trauma left by Japanese colonialism. Initially planned to be erected in front of the Japanese Consulate General in the city, activists ignored the authorities’ order to stay away from the diplomatic mission during heated tensions between the two nations. After being forcibly removed and relocated twice, the statue stands 100 metres away from the Consulate by the Statue of General Jeong Bal. This case study examines the role of civic action in establishing a visual representation of a colonial legacy, as well as the position of the authorities who, though mainly in agreement with the activists&#8217; goals, opposed the confrontational placing of the statue in front of the Consulate out of realpolitik considerations.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/wartime-labourer-statue-in-busan">Wartime Labourer Statue in Busan</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>João Maria Ferreira do Amaral Statue in Macau (SAR)</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/joao-maria-ferreira-do-amaral-statue-in-macau-sar?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=joao-maria-ferreira-do-amaral-statue-in-macau-sar</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Resolved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#36]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>João Maria Ferreira do Amaral was the Portuguese Governor of Macau between 1846-1849, his commitment to formalizing Macau and Portugal’s colonial relationship, lead to his assassination by Chinese peasants. He became emblematic of the ambiguous colonial relationship between the two countries, leading to his statue being removed during the decolonization of Macau, and sent to [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/joao-maria-ferreira-do-amaral-statue-in-macau-sar">João Maria Ferreira do Amaral Statue in Macau (SAR)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">João Maria Ferreira do Amaral was the Portuguese Governor of Macau between 1846-1849, his commitment to formalizing Macau and Portugal’s colonial relationship, lead to his assassination by Chinese peasants. He became emblematic of the ambiguous colonial relationship between the two countries, leading to his statue being removed during the decolonization of Macau, and sent to Portugal, where it stands to this day.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/joao-maria-ferreira-do-amaral-statue-in-macau-sar">João Maria Ferreira do Amaral Statue in Macau (SAR)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mauritshuis in The Hague</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/maurithuis-in-the-hague?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=maurithuis-in-the-hague</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#106]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Mauritshuis bears the name of Johan Maurits van Nassau-Siegen (1604–1679), who commissioned its construction and was its first occupant. In early 2018, the Mauritshuis faced an intense but brief controversy following its earlier removal of Johan Maurits&#8217; bust from its foyer. Opponents such as Piet Emmer and centre-right to right-wing politicians, including Prime Minister [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/maurithuis-in-the-hague">Mauritshuis in The Hague</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Mauritshuis bears the name of Johan Maurits van Nassau-Siegen (1604–1679), who commissioned its construction and was its first occupant. In early 2018, the Mauritshuis faced an intense but brief controversy following its earlier removal of Johan Maurits&#8217; bust from its foyer. Opponents such as Piet Emmer and centre-right to right-wing politicians, including Prime Minister Mark Rutte, argued against removing historical figures and images from public spaces, claiming that such a desire demonstrates a lack of historical understanding and would result in an &#8216;iconoclastic fury&#8217; erasing both heroics and wrongs. On the other hand, supporters of the museum’s decision to provide more context on their namesake hoped it would be a step towards engaging critically with the Dutch slavery past. This case study explores the controversy&#8217;s media frenzy, its ties to the broader public discourse on Dutch colonial history, and its impact on the museum&#8217;s policies and programs.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/maurithuis-in-the-hague">Mauritshuis in The Hague</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>I am Queen Mary Statue in Copenhagen</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/i-am-queen-mary-statue-in-copenhagen?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=i-am-queen-mary-statue-in-copenhagen</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 10:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[#49]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ongoing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 2018, artists La Vaughn Belle and Jeannette Ehlers created the ‘I Am Queen Mary’ Statue. The monument honours Mary Thomas, one of the three female leaders of the 1878 ‘Fireburn’ Rebellion, a revolt against Danish colonial rule on the Caribbean island of St. Croix. The monument was unveiled during the centenary celebrations of the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/i-am-queen-mary-statue-in-copenhagen">I am Queen Mary Statue in Copenhagen</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In 2018, artists La Vaughn Belle and Jeannette Ehlers created the ‘I Am Queen Mary’ Statue. The monument honours Mary Thomas, one of the three female leaders of the 1878 ‘Fireburn’ Rebellion, a revolt against Danish colonial rule on the Caribbean island of St. Croix. The monument was unveiled during the centenary celebrations of the sale of the Danish West Indies to the United States. Initially, the statue was made of lightweight material and placed temporarily outside a former West Indian warehouse in Copenhagen. In 2020, after years of campaigning, the Danish government agreed to display the statue permanently. During a storm in December 2020, the statue was irreparably damaged. In August 2021, a fundraising campaign began to cast the statue in bronze and display it and a twin version in Copenhagen and St. Croix. This case study examines how contemporary monuments can reshape historical narratives.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/i-am-queen-mary-statue-in-copenhagen">I am Queen Mary Statue in Copenhagen</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salazar Statue in Maputo</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/salazar-statue-in-maputo?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=salazar-statue-in-maputo</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ongoing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fascism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[321]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A life-sized bronze statue of Portuguese dictator António de Oliveira Salazar (b. 1889-1970) currently stands in the courtyard of the National Library in Maputo, Mozambique. Its move to this location in 2002 is part of an eventful prior itinerary, charted below by drawing on various sources while acknowledging the presence of certain gaps in the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/salazar-statue-in-maputo">Salazar Statue in Maputo</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A life-sized bronze statue of Portuguese dictator António de Oliveira Salazar (b. 1889-1970) currently stands in the courtyard of the National Library in Maputo, Mozambique. Its move to this location in 2002 is part of an eventful prior itinerary, charted below by drawing on various sources while acknowledging the presence of certain gaps in the data. The statue can be seen as part of a political project of the Portuguese Estado Novo (New State) enacted via public monuments. Its history and present setting relate to the tensions inherent in the relationship between this project and Mozambican anti- and post-colonial reality.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/salazar-statue-in-maputo">Salazar Statue in Maputo</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monuments Matter</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/uncategorized/monuments-matter-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=monuments-matter-2</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enslavement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#173]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Removal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/?p=321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, protestors in the English port city of Bristol toppled a statue of an 18th Century slave- trader, dragged the life-size bronze through the streets, and heaved it over a stone embankment into the Bristol harbour. Hundreds of Bristol residents looked on and cheered. (See&#160;appended link). The statue’s unauthorized removal and disposal appeared to resolve [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/uncategorized/monuments-matter-2/">Monuments Matter</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Yesterday, protestors in the English port city of Bristol toppled a statue of an 18th Century slave- trader, dragged the life-size bronze through the streets, and heaved it over a stone embankment into the Bristol harbour. Hundreds of Bristol residents looked on and cheered. (See&nbsp;<a href="https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/07/edward-colston-statue-pulled-bristol-black-lives-matter-protesters/">appended link</a>). The statue’s unauthorized removal and disposal appeared to resolve a decades-long debate over Edward Colston, a slave trader and local benefactor, whose name and image are honored throughout the city, including by a statue on central square. &#8220;Well that put an end to the debate (unless someone tries to put it back up),” someone observed on Twitter Sunday afternoon. “Slave trader Edward Colston statue taken down in #Bristol #BlackLivesMattters&#8221;.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Colston statue “removal” is the most dramatic turn in a series of incidents that have found statues at the center of mass protests over the killing of a black man, George Floyd, by police in Minnesota. Last Saturday, protesters placed a noose around the neck of a statue of a Confederate general and toppled it from its plinth in a park in Richmond, Virginia. A few days earlier, a statue of Philadelphia’s former mayor and police chief, Frank Rizzo, an avowed racist, was removed by the city when the statue became the focus of mass protests, as reported on&nbsp;<a href="https://www.euroclio.eu/2020/06/02/monuments-matter-a-comment-on-philadelphia/">this blog</a>.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">As one of Bristol’s leading slave traders and most generous benefactors, Edward Colston is omnipresent in this southwestern port city. Statues, schools, parks, streets and even pastries bear his name. The main cathedral has a large stained-glass window commemorating Colston, and each year November 13 is celebrated as “Colston Day.” At Colston&#8217;s Girls&#8217; School, the pupils wear “Colston&#8217;s flower” (chrysanthemum), and during the school ceremony read passages of his will while hearing a sermon on the good Samaritan. They were never told about the 85,000 people enslaved on Royal African Company ships while he was involved with the company.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bristol’s confrontation with the Edward Colston legacy dates to 1921 when a biography written by Rev Wilkes questioned Bristol’s “cult of Colston”, detailing Colston’s involvement in slavery. It took another 70 years for the controversy to come to broader public attention. In 1998 an activist scrawled the words &#8216;Slave Trader&#8217; on the statue&#8217;s base, and the protest movement became more vocal. In 2015, a new civil society campaign, Countering Colston, was formed, carrying out historical research, cataloguing the various Colston memorializations in the city and publicizing findings in the local press. Countering Colston also lobbied to have the name erased from Colston Hall, the city’s primary music venue, and Colston Primary School.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In 2007 when Nelson Mandela was invited to Bristol to commemorate the bicentennial of the act abolishing the slave trade in Bristol, local activists wrote to the South African president cautioning him that “Bristol is not quite the liberal, multi-racial place it pretends to be”. Mandela declined the invitation. That same year, the BBC reported that the popular Bristol rock band, Massive Attack refused to perform at Colston Hall, where stars like The Beatles, David Bowie, Bob Dylan and others have performed.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Marti Burgess, a Countering Colston activist, and a former trustee of Colston Hall, was instrumental in persuading the board to change the name of the Hall. In April 2017, the trustees voted to rename the venue as part of the refurbishment for its 150th anniversary in 2020. Two petitions circulated opposing the renaming, each gathering circa 5000 names. Dr Joanna Burch-Brown from the University of Bristol, an active member of Countering Colston, analyzed the social media responses, as well as the hundreds of letters submitted to the local press. “Letter-writers argued that removing Colston’s name from Colston Hall amounted to erasing history,” Burch-Brown wrote, summarizing a wide range of arguments, “sanitizing the past, destroying heritage, doing injustice to a great Bristolian, pandering to a politically correct minority, removing decisions about Bristolian heritage from Bristolian hands, ignoring the fact that white people too have been exploited and enslaved, indulging a ‘snowflake’ victim mentality, ignoring more important contemporary issues like ‘modern day slavery’ and FGM, and unfairly blaming British people for slavery when it was Africans who enslaved fellow Africans in the first place.” Burch-Brown cites letter-writers who called the renaming Colston Hall ‘a fascist, Stalinesque and Orwellian rewriting of history.’” 1</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The movement was also successful in bringing name change to Colston’s Primary School, which, over a three-month period, held an awareness-raising campaign with the school community, after which they voted to rename the school. Unlike the response to the renaming of Colston Hall, the press reported little negative reaction, due perhaps to the consultative process undertaken by the school administrators. In spring 2018, the new lord mayor of Bristol, Cleo Lake, an activist with Countering Colston, ordered Colston’s portrait removed from her office. “I won’t be comfortable sharing it with the portrait of Colston,” Lake told the press. “As part of my role in campaigning with the Countering Colston team, I also think it’s fitting that I don’t share this office with the portrait.”</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Deliberations were also underway for the disposition of the Colston statue until last Sunday when Bristol residents took matters into the their own hands. The city must now decide whether to leave Colston at the bottom of the river, fish the statue out and find it a new home, or “put it back up,” as the Sunday tweet observed, and let the debate go on.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">[1] Joanna Burch-Brown, “Is it Wrong to Topple Statues&amp; Rename Schools? Journal of Political Theory and Philosophy, 2017 Vol 1: 72-73.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><em>Originally published via <a href="https://www.euroclio.eu/2020/06/08/monuments-matter-comment-on-bristol/">EuroClio News</a> on 8 June 2020.</em></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Interested in further exploring the topic of contested monuments? EuroClio has published a&nbsp;<a href="https://historiana.eu/#/historical-content/source-collections/cultural-heritage-monuments-representing-controversial-history">source collection</a>&nbsp;that offers&nbsp;various examples from across Europe of controversial monuments and of monuments that represent/commemorate controversial history.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/uncategorized/monuments-matter-2/">Monuments Matter</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fearless Girl Statue in New York</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/fearless-girl-statue-in-new-york?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fearless-girl-statue-in-new-york</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resolved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[219]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Kristen Visbal’s iconic Fearless Girl statue has been the subject of heated and ongoing contestation since its installation on New York’s Wall Street in 2017 and its subsequent relocation. Controversy arose over the significance and suitability of its original positioning opposite Arturo Di Modica’s Charging Bull (1989). The statue also sparked discourse regarding appropriate representations [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/fearless-girl-statue-in-new-york">Fearless Girl Statue in New York</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Kristen Visbal’s iconic Fearless Girl statue has been the subject of heated and ongoing contestation since its installation on New York’s Wall Street in 2017 and its subsequent relocation. Controversy arose over the significance and suitability of its original positioning opposite Arturo Di Modica’s Charging Bull (1989). The statue also sparked discourse regarding appropriate representations of female empowerment and the relationship between artwork and advertising. In 2018, the piece was relocated to Broad Street, facing the New York Stock Exchange. This case study explores the controversy surrounding one of New York’s most iconic and well-known symbolic representations.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/fearless-girl-statue-in-new-york">Fearless Girl Statue in New York</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Isted Lion in Flensburg</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/isted-lion-in-flensburg?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=isted-lion-in-flensburg</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2022 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resolved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[48]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Isted Lion, created to commemorate the Danish victory in the 1850 Battle of Isted, has been the subject of German-Danish debates about national and cultural identity in the historically contested Schleswig border region since it was first erected in 1862. This case study examines the journey of the statue across multiple cities in Denmark [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/isted-lion-in-flensburg">Isted Lion in Flensburg</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Isted Lion, created to commemorate the Danish victory in the 1850 Battle of Isted, has been the subject of German-Danish debates about national and cultural identity in the historically contested Schleswig border region since it was first erected in 1862. This case study examines the journey of the statue across multiple cities in Denmark and Germany, which culminated in its return to its original location in the town of Flensburg in 2011. In addition, it analyses the decision-making processes and variety of actors involved in the debates, as well as continued controversies about the contemporary symbolism of the monument.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/isted-lion-in-flensburg">Isted Lion in Flensburg</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
