<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Monument Archives - Contested Histories</title>
	<atom:link href="https://contestedhistories.org/tag/monument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://contestedhistories.org/tag/monument/</link>
	<description>Practical remedies to disputes over historical markers in public spaces</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2025 10:55:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Van Heutz Indië-Nederland Monument in Amsterdam</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/van-heutz-indie-nederland-monument-in-amsterdam?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=van-heutz-indie-nederland-monument-in-amsterdam</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Monument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resolved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resignification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#108]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Since its unveiling in 1935, the ‘Van Heutsz’ Monument has faced controversy surrounding the legacy of Dutch colonialism in Indonesia, attributed to General Jo van Heutsz. The monument has survived defacement, two bomb attacks, and years of decay. In 2001, in response to increasing scrutiny, the Amsterdam Oud-Zuid district council renamed the site to ‘Monument [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/van-heutz-indie-nederland-monument-in-amsterdam">Van Heutz Indië-Nederland Monument in Amsterdam</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Since its unveiling in 1935, the ‘Van Heutsz’ Monument has faced controversy surrounding the legacy of Dutch colonialism in Indonesia, attributed to General Jo van Heutsz. The monument has survived defacement, two bomb attacks, and years of decay. In 2001, in response to increasing scrutiny, the Amsterdam Oud-Zuid district council renamed the site to ‘Monument Indië-Nederland.’ This case study examines the transition from honouring Van Heutsz to commemorating colonisation in the context of recent acknowledgements from King Willem-Alexander and a continued social debate on the legacy of slavery and colonialism.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/van-heutz-indie-nederland-monument-in-amsterdam">Van Heutz Indië-Nederland Monument in Amsterdam</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Martyr&#8217;s Square and Statue in Beirut</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/martyrs-square-and-statue-in-beirut?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=martyrs-square-and-statue-in-beirut</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resolved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#95]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Martyrs’ Square, a public space in Beirut, Lebanon, has a century-long history as a cultural symbol and centre of political resistance. Throughout multiple transformations and governmental regimes, Martyrs’ Square has represented the confl icts and turmoil of Lebanon itself. The contemporary role of Martyrs’ Square is that of a political forum, and it is currently [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/martyrs-square-and-statue-in-beirut">Martyr&#8217;s Square and Statue in Beirut</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Martyrs’ Square, a public space in Beirut, Lebanon, has a century-long history as a cultural symbol and centre of political resistance. Throughout multiple transformations and governmental regimes, Martyrs’ Square has represented the confl icts and turmoil of Lebanon itself. The contemporary role of Martyrs’ Square is that of a political forum, and it is currently the site of protests related to the Lebanese fi scal crisis. This case study examines the importance of Martyrs’ Square in Beirut.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/martyrs-square-and-statue-in-beirut">Martyr&#8217;s Square and Statue in Beirut</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victims of Political Repression Monument in Tayshet</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/victims-of-political-repression-monument-in-tayshet?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=victims-of-political-repression-monument-in-tayshet</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Authoritarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Status Quo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unresolved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#498]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the summer of 2020, a monument to the victims of Stalinist political repression was unveiled in the city of Tayshet in Irkutsk Oblast, Russia. On July 4, 2020, the monument was vandalised and defaced, making the inscription illegible. During Soviet rule, the Gulag camp Taishetlag was located near the city, making Tayshet a stop [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/victims-of-political-repression-monument-in-tayshet">Victims of Political Repression Monument in Tayshet</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the summer of 2020, a monument to the victims of Stalinist political repression was unveiled in the city of Tayshet in Irkutsk Oblast, Russia. On July 4, 2020, the monument was vandalised and defaced, making the inscription illegible. During Soviet rule, the Gulag camp Taishetlag was located near the city, making Tayshet a stop which all prisoners made on their journey to the Gulag. In the twenty-first century, President Vladimir Putin’s reconstruction of Stalin’s figure and Soviet patriotism provoked the emergence of many new monuments to Stalin and the vandalism of those commemorating victims. Monuments remembering the victims of the Stalinist era provide a physical and spatial rebuttal to heroic memories of Stalinism. This case analyses the ongoing clash between the unofficial rehabilitation of Stalin and the commemoration of victims of the Soviet system of repression, taking the monument in Tayshet as an example.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/victims-of-political-repression-monument-in-tayshet">Victims of Political Repression Monument in Tayshet</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coronation Park in New Delhi</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/coronation-park-in-new-delhi?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=coronation-park-in-new-delhi</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Monument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counter Monument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[313]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the 1960s, two decades after India’s independence from colonial rule, certain sections ofthe society demanded the removal of specific memorial markers of the colonial past. Thincluded the statues in the Coronation Park in the capital of the country, New Delhi. TheCoronation Park harks back to the times of coronation and celebrations through a pageantheld [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/coronation-park-in-new-delhi">Coronation Park in New Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the 1960s, two decades after India’s independence from colonial rule, certain sections of<br>the society demanded the removal of specific memorial markers of the colonial past. Th<br>included the statues in the Coronation Park in the capital of the country, New Delhi. The<br>Coronation Park harks back to the times of coronation and celebrations through a pageant<br>held in the park by the imperial powers to display the prowess of the colonial throne. This<br>was seen as a widely celebrated affair attended by the rulers then. However, after the<br>independence, sites such as Coronation Park embody the dilemma and contestation around<br>the legacy of preservation and heritage of the imperial past. This case study then discusses<br>the approaches the governments may take to deal with the varied systems of meaning that<br>such memorial markers impose on their history and present.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/coronation-park-in-new-delhi">Coronation Park in New Delhi</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three Dikgosi Monument in Gaborone</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/three-dikgosi-monument-in-gabarone?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=three-dikgosi-monument-in-gabarone</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Ongoing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Status Quo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[252]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monument]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On September 29, 2005, a statue of three dikgosi (kings) who visited England in 1895 to protestagainst the imminent handover of their lands to the British South Africa Company was unveiledin Botswana’s capital city, Gaborone. The three dikgosi are seen as ‘Founders of the Nation’ andthe monument also tells the ‘history’ of Botswana. However, overlooking [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/three-dikgosi-monument-in-gabarone">Three Dikgosi Monument in Gaborone</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On September 29, 2005, a statue of three dikgosi (kings) who visited England in 1895 to protest<br>against the imminent handover of their lands to the British South Africa Company was unveiled<br>in Botswana’s capital city, Gaborone. The three dikgosi are seen as ‘Founders of the Nation’ and<br>the monument also tells the ‘history’ of Botswana. However, overlooking local artists in<br>contracting the statue sparked controversy. Additionally, activists contest the perceived<br>expression of Tswana domination.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/three-dikgosi-monument-in-gabarone">Three Dikgosi Monument in Gaborone</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bremen’s Elefant: Memorialisation, politics, and memory surrounding German colonialism</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/uncategorized/bremens-elefant/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bremens-elefant</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 13:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resolved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[234]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/?p=2000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In 1932, German citizens gathered for the dedication of the Kolonialelefant in Bremen. The Bremen Colonial Society created this monument in memory of the German soldiers who died in the German colonies during the First World War. As well as to glorify colonialism and bolster the neo-colonial movement (after the Treaty of Versailles had stripped [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/uncategorized/bremens-elefant/">Bremen’s Elefant: Memorialisation, politics, and memory surrounding German colonialism</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In 1932, German citizens gathered for the dedication of the <em>Kolonialelefant</em> in Bremen. The Bremen Colonial Society created this monument in memory of the German soldiers who died in the German colonies during the First World War. As well as to glorify colonialism and bolster the neo-colonial movement (after the Treaty of Versailles had stripped Germany of its colonies in 1919). The first speaker at the ceremony was Eduard Achelis, Chairman of the Bremen section of the <em>Deutsche Kolonialgesellschaft</em> (German Colonial Society). In his speech, he stated:</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In this solemn hour dedicated to our colonies, may the whole German people step up and […] unanimously shout to the world: Away with the events of the past, with lies and slander; we Germans demand our rights. The recognition of necessary living conditions. Immediate return of our own land, honestly acquired and honestly managed, an expensive legacy left to us by our fathers: the German colonies.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Achelis and many others, the value of the <em>Elefant</em> lay not in the memory of the specific German soldiers who had lost their lives but in the reminder of the sacrifice that went into obtaining and controlling colonial land in Africa: the injustice of that land being taken away. A specific version of colonialism was publicly displayed through the <em>Kolonialelefant</em>: colonialism was a worthy venture that brought glory and prosperity. The city’s actions followed this version of colonial memory. The National Socialists of Bremen established the town as the ‘Capital of the Colonies’ after the statue’s dedication, and in 1938, a convention that brought together all of the German colonial organisations was held in Bremen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Six decades later, the <em>Elefant</em> underwent a second dedication – this time it was dedicated as the <em>Anti-Kolonial-Denk-Mal</em> (Anti-Colonial Monument). Before the ceremony, the<em> Elefant</em> was wrapped in fabric ‘chains’ of racism and colonialism, which were cut away during the ceremony. Speeches were given that grieved the atrocities of German colonialism, and a plaque was unveiled, which provided a history of German colonialism and the monument’s problematic creation. The plaque also highlighted the reason for rededicating the memorial: ‘This monument is a symbol of the responsibility we have inherited from history.’ Many Bremen-based organisations were involved in the rededication process, and other efforts to campaign for greater awareness of Germany’s colonial past. The fond memory of German colonialism that prevailed in Bremen in the 1930s was replaced by a memory of German colonialism shrouded in racism and violence.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The <em>Elefant</em> is both a reflection of and exception to German memorial culture. Like the <em>Elefant</em>,<em> </em>&nbsp;German colonial memorials created before the Holocaust glorified colonialism. After the Holocaust, when genocide was defined and criminalised, there was a gap in German colonial memorialisation. No longer were memorials glorifying colonialism erected, and colonial monuments that already existed, including the <em>Elefant</em>, were largely left to decay.&nbsp;</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">In the 1970s and 80s, the anti-apartheid movement swept across Europe, bringing awareness to the lasting impact of colonialism. Citizens in Bremen began to analyse how the city was responsible for the disastrous situation in South West Africa, particularly in Namibia (then controlled by South Africa), a former German colony. It is at this point, Bremen began to be an exception to overall German memorial culture, starting with the creation of initiatives to support Namibia and its independence movement. In 1980 the Centre for African Studies at Bremen University co-founded the Namibia Project, the purpose of which was to promote education and improve the legal system in Namibia.&nbsp;&nbsp;This programme spread beyond the University, creating connections with political groups across the Bremen area. In 1989, Bremen joined the Europe-wide campaign ‘Cities against Apartheid’.&nbsp;At the time, movements against colonialism and apartheid were yet to gain momentum in Germany. Germany’s official policy was cooperation and even friendship with South Africa while ignoring apartheid and the illegal occupation of South West Africa and, in some sense, supporting the occupation due to lobbying by the German minority living in South West Africa.&nbsp;Bremen’s efforts to improve the situation in South West Africa were accompanied by initiatives for greater awareness of Germany’s colonial past. Activist individuals and organisations in Bremen wrote educational materials for schools and articles for newspapers and academic journals while also organising awareness campaigns in the city.&nbsp;These decolonisation efforts led to a renewed focus on the <em>Elefant</em> statue, the very existence of which was a symbol of Bremen’s former support of colonialism. By rededicating the <em>Elefant</em>, Bremen confronted a colonial legacy that the rest of Germany had been ignoring for decades. The <em>Elefant</em> remains one of the only anti-colonial memorials in Germany – evidence of the nation’s continued willful amnesia of its colonial crimes.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Works Cited</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">‘Treaty of Versailles’, <em>United States Library of Congress</em>, June 28, 1919, Part IV Section I.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">‘Einweihung des deutschen Kolonial-Ehrenmals’, 7 July 1932, Ausgabe Nr. 187 Drittes Blatt, Schünemann, Bremen, quoted in G. Eickelberg, ‘Die Geschichte des Bremer AntiKolonialDenkmals’, Feb. 2012.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Plenipotentiary of the Free Hanseatic City of Bremen for Federal Affairs, Europe and Development Co-operation, ‘Co-operation Bremen – Namibia: A Responsibility Posed by History’ (Bremen, 1999).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">‘Als Bremen „Stadt der Kolonien” sein wollte’, <em>WK Geschichte </em>[Bremen], (27 May 2018).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bremen State Office for Development Co-operation, ‘Vom Kolonial-Ehrenmal zum Anti-Kolonial-Denk-Mal’ (Bremen, 2004).</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bremen Parliament, Entschließung der Stadtbürgerschaft vom 19.9.1989, ‘Die Stadtbürgeschaft begrüßt die 1986 in Den Haag gestartete europäische Aktion “Städte gegen Apartheid” und schließt sich ihr an’, September 19, 1989.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/uncategorized/bremens-elefant/">Bremen’s Elefant: Memorialisation, politics, and memory surrounding German colonialism</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mullivaikkal Memorial at Jaffna University</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/mullivaikkal-memorial-at-jaffna-university?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=mullivaikkal-memorial-at-jaffna-university</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[236]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resolved]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On the night of January 9, 2021, students protested outside of Jaffna University against the university’s decision to destroy a memorial commemorating the Tamil victims of the three-decade-long civil war. The war ended in 2009 at Mullivaikkal, a small village in the northeast coast, and the memorial was erected ten years later by university students. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/mullivaikkal-memorial-at-jaffna-university">Mullivaikkal Memorial at Jaffna University</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the night of January 9, 2021, students protested outside of Jaffna University against the university’s decision to destroy a memorial commemorating the Tamil victims of the three-decade-long civil war. The war ended in 2009 at Mullivaikkal, a small village in the northeast coast, and the memorial was erected ten years later by university students. A few days later, on January 12, Sri Lanka’s government said it would rebuild the monument. This case explores the politics of reconciliation and remembrance in post-conflict societies.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/mullivaikkal-memorial-at-jaffna-university">Mullivaikkal Memorial at Jaffna University</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Statue of Catherine II &#8216;the Great&#8217; or the Monument to the Odessa Founders</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/occasional-papers/the-statue-of-catherine-ii-the-great-or-the-monument-to-the-odessa-founders?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-statue-of-catherine-ii-the-great-or-the-monument-to-the-odessa-founders</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Contested Histories Admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 14:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Occasional Papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[177]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ongoing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Ukraine By Olivia Durand May 2022</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/occasional-papers/the-statue-of-catherine-ii-the-great-or-the-monument-to-the-odessa-founders">The Statue of Catherine II &#8216;the Great&#8217; or the Monument to the Odessa Founders</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"><strong>Ukraine</strong></p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">By Olivia Durand</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">May 2022</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/occasional-papers/the-statue-of-catherine-ii-the-great-or-the-monument-to-the-odessa-founders">The Statue of Catherine II &#8216;the Great&#8217; or the Monument to the Odessa Founders</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lenin Statue in Bishkek</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/lenin-statue-in-bishkek?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=lenin-statue-in-bishkek</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2022 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Monument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Removal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authoritarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[93]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Lenin Statue in Bishkek was erected in 1984, during the 60th anniversary of the Kyrgyz Soviet Socialist Republic. Shortly after the fall of communism in 1991, all Lenin statues were taken down. However, Bishkek’s Lenin stood in the same square until 2003. This year, the square was going to be renovated to celebrate the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/lenin-statue-in-bishkek">Lenin Statue in Bishkek</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The Lenin Statue in Bishkek was erected in 1984, during the 60th anniversary of the Kyrgyz Soviet Socialist Republic. Shortly after the fall of communism in 1991, all Lenin statues were taken down. However, Bishkek’s Lenin stood in the same square until 2003. This year, the square was going to be renovated to celebrate the 2.200 anniversary of the Kyrgyz statehood. The Lenin statue was then relocated near the Old Square. The reason for the relocation remains unclear. The government’s explanation’s vagueness and inconsistency allowed different interpretations to appear and provoked different reactions. This case analyses the process of contestation that started after the relocation of the Lenin statue.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph"></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/lenin-statue-in-bishkek">Lenin Statue in Bishkek</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faidherbe Statue in Lille</title>
		<link>https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/faidherbe-statue-in-lille?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=faidherbe-statue-in-lille</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paula]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2022 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Colonialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monument]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Status Quo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[57]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://contestedhistories.org/resources//</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>For the bicentenary of the birth of French General Louis Faidherbe in 2018, a protest campaign named ‘Faidherbe Doit Tomber’ (Faidherbe Must Fall) was organised contesting the Monument au Général Faidherbe (monument to General Faidherbe) located in Lille, France. The statue, which was erected in 1896, celebrates the general’s heroism during the Franco-Prussian war of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/faidherbe-statue-in-lille">Faidherbe Statue in Lille</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the bicentenary of the birth of French General Louis Faidherbe in 2018, a protest campaign named ‘Faidherbe Doit Tomber’ (Faidherbe Must Fall) was organised contesting the Monument au Général Faidherbe (monument to General Faidherbe) located in Lille, France. The statue, which was erected in 1896, celebrates the general’s heroism during the Franco-Prussian war of 1870-1871. Since 2017, the monument has been heavily contested due to Faidherbe’s one-time position as governor of Senegal, during which time he conducted particularly violent and destructive campaigns in order to further French trading interests. The protest was sparked by the 2017 debate over a statue of Faidherbe located in the city of Saint Louis, in Senegal, and then further influenced by the French Black Lives Matter movement in 2020.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://contestedhistories.org/resources/case-studies/faidherbe-statue-in-lille">Faidherbe Statue in Lille</a> appeared first on <a href="https://contestedhistories.org">Contested Histories</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
